Reuben Paterson. Photograph by Glenn Frei.
Reuben Paterson. Photograph by Glenn Frei.
Guide and checklists for AMPs explaining how to report a resale
AMP obligations under the Resale Right for Visual Artists Act 2023
Understand your obligations as an AMP and how the scheme is administered.
Which party is required to pay the royalty and when?
Art market professional’s concerned about whether the royalty accounts for differing AMP costs should note that the royalty is calculated exclusive of (i.e. disregards) any costs associated with the resale.
This leaves it up to the art market professional, the buyer, and the seller, to freely agree their costs, premiums, commissions etc and determine what is, in their particular circumstances, fair and lawful between them.
It is not the purpose or function of the legislation to presume, dictate, or discriminate those private commercial arrangements. Instead, the legislation creates a predictable royalty by using a fixed percentage of the resale value. This is the same for every qualifying resale, and every liable AMP.
This creates benefits to art market professional and artists alike. Negotiation, custom, and freedom of contract, will determine fairness between parties to the resale contract as to their own costs, premiums etc. And whatever they freely decide about those (and however that varies case-by-case), won’t prejudice or affect the “resale value” or the royalty total, which also ensures transparency and fairness to the artist.
The Transfer of a collector’s estate is unlikely to count as a qualifying resale unless there is consideration given. If no consideration is given, then in our view that is not a qualifying resale. If, however, consideration is given it may be a qualifying resale.
Currently the artist resale royalty will apply for 50 years after the death of the artist which aligns with New Zealand’s current Copyright Act. However our understanding is that the Copyright term will be extended prior 1 May 2028, and we would expect that the ARR term will then also be extended to align with the Copyright Act.
Australia and the United Kingdom are reciprocating countries. RRA collects royalties for Australian and United Kingdom artists when they make a qualifying resale in New Zealand, and vice versa.
The Act does not define what a limited number of copies is, although there is provision in the Copyright Act that a 3 Dimensional artwork that has fewer than 50 copies produced is copyright protectable, so this might be a useful benchmark. We suggest using good faith best efforts to do your due diligence in researching, and keep a record of your research in case it is needed at a future date. If you have any concerns or want to discuss then please just get in touch with us.
The resale is considered a professional resale because an art market professional is involved. That means, provided it meets the standard criteria, it will be a qualifying resale.
Section 7(3) of the Act states “An artist has a right under this section irrespective of whether they are or were the first owner of copyright in the artwork.”
This means that if the artwork was “commissioned” (as per Section 21(3) of the Copyright Act), then the artist who created the artwork is not the first owner of the copyright, and is still therefore potentially eligible for the artist resale royalty, as long as they are an “Eligible Artist”, the artwork is an “original visual artwork” by the artist, and the resale occurs before the right to receive the ARR has expired (see checklist 4 for more detailed information on when the ARR right expires).
There are legal obligations for Art Market Professions which require them to:
These are explained in our Guide: Information for Art Market Professionals.
Please register to stay informed about your obligations under the scheme, and to receive administrative support with compliance.
(*This assumes the Art Market Professional is acting as agent for the seller on a resale. In cases where there is no agent for the seller, then instead the buyer’s agent or the buyer will be jointly liable with the seller to make paymen
The resale royalty payable is calculated at 5% of the “resale value” of the qualifying resale (section 16).
Section 10 says that “resale value” means: “the value of the consideration given for the visual artwork under the contract for resale” which may include:
‘Resale value’ does not include:
Plain English Guidelines
In plain English, this means that the “Resale Value” is the amount the buyer has agreed to pay the seller for the artwork itself. All external and other associated costs (taxes, fees, or levies, etc) are separate to (not part of) the scheme or the Resale Value calculation. This ensures the value of the royalty relates directly to the value of the artwork itself, and is not subject to other external or variable factors.
For example:
An original visual artwork sells at auction. The sale and purchase agreement records that the buyer will pay $2,000 to the seller as consideration for the artwork (plus any applicable fees and taxes).
Under the AMP’s terms of service, the parties agree that the seller will pay the AMP a 20% commission ($400) for acting as its agent, and the buyer will pay the AMP a 15% premium (additional amount) ($300) for facilitating the resale.
Resale Value
Assuming the Act applies, in the example given above:
Other Associated Costs:
Other fees, costs, taxes etc may or may not apply to the sale. These are, however, separate matters to the value given for the artwork.
It is important to distinguish these other transactions from the “Resale Value”. Note that commissions, premiums, taxes, and other costs are usually separately stated in your legal documents and invoices. For example, they may appear as separate & distinct line items to the hammer price, within the same invoice (or in separate invoices). They may appear in the AMP’s terms of service rather than in the contract for resale.
A helpful way to distinguish “Resale Value” from “costs associated” is first to ask (1) who is paying whom, and second to ask (2) in respect of what? For example, “Resale value” is (in plain English) the amount the buyer has agreed to pay the seller, for the artwork. By contrast:
The amount is the same for both eligible artists and successors, a 5% royalty will be collected for eligible artists each time there is a qualifying resale of their original visual artwork.
The collection and distribution of the payment is managed by RRA, a not-for-profit. RRA will retain 20% for the purpose of funding RRA operations and distribute the remainder of the royalty to the visual artist or successor.
A royalty is payable on each resale.
Who is liable in each instance is answered by section 17 of the Act. The seller is always liable, and generally their agent will be jointly and severally liable. Generally a buyer won’t be liable unless no agent is involved.
To give two contrasting examples:
Where a gallery buys from an auction house or art consultant (who is acting behalf of a seller), the liable parties will be the seller and the seller’s agent (i.e. auction house or art consultant). It’s unlikely the purchasing gallery would be liable in this scenario (unless the seller actually has no agent, and the buyer has no agent).
Where a gallery buys directly from another gallery (without using any agents), then the buying gallery will indeed be jointly liable with the selling gallery to pay the royalty on the purchase. (How the two galleries share this liability will be a private matter). The buying gallery will then be liable as a seller if/when they come to resell.
If copies are not numbered as with a limited edition print, and there is no other information available to help ascertain how many copies have been made, then you can possibly assume it is not a sufficiently limited number and therefore not a qualifying resale. The Act does not define what a limited number of copies is, although there is provision in the Copyright Act that a 3 Dimensional artwork that has fewer than 50 copies produced is copyright protectable, so this might be a useful benchmark. We suggest using good faith best efforts to do your due diligence in researching, and keep a record of your research in case it is needed at a future date. If you have any concerns or want to discuss then please just get in touch with us.
If a liable person fails to pay a resale royalty, or fails to provide the required reporting information, or if any other requirement of the Act is not complied with, then the Act provides that the Collection Agency may apply to a court for orders enforcing these obligations, and for any other order that is appropriate for an infringement of a property right. The Act provides that this does not limit any other proceeding that may otherwise be taken by the Collection Agency, a right holder, or any other person affected. Nor does it limit any other power of the court.
You are only required to report a Qualifying resale as defined in the Act. The scheme will operate on good faith and the belief that you are better qualified to determine whether a purchased item is a qualifying resale or not, and we will not be investigating your decisions unless independently alerted
Art Market Professionals: